# US Pediatric Ophthalmology Workforce Strain and the Geographic Access Cliff

## Headline findings

The cleanest read of the current U.S. picture is this: depending on how one counts, the country appears to have roughly **1,056 pediatric ophthalmologists listed in public directories in March 2022** and **1,060 listed in April 2023**, but recent reviews argue that only **about 800 to 900** may be actively providing surgical pediatric ophthalmology care. Using the 2022 directory-based count, the U.S. had **12.7 pediatric ophthalmologists per 1 million people younger than 19 years**. Meanwhile, **90.0% to 90.2% of U.S. counties had none**, and a newer coverage analysis found **about 1 in 7 American children live more than 60 minutes from pediatric ophthalmology care**. The pipeline is weak: across fellowship cycles from 2016 to 2024, pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus fellowships had an **average vacancy rate of 29.8%**, and the share of available positions filled by U.S. graduates fell from **72% in 2016 to 47% in 2024**. citeturn14search11turn14search3turn30search17turn21search2turn11search1turn11search4turn15search2

The economic signal points the same way. A 2022 survey of 243 pediatric ophthalmologists found widespread revenue compression and rising overhead, while a 2023 Medicaid-focused study found that academic eye centers and children’s hospitals had **mean wait times of 3.9 months for a new patient visit**, **3.4 months for follow-up**, and **2.7 months for non-emergency surgery**, with longer new-patient waits in more Medicaid-heavy states. In another survey, **6.5% of respondents reported retiring in the prior 3 years**, and **37.8% said they would not recommend pediatric ophthalmology fellowship to a resident**. citeturn28search3turn30search7turn24search5

The orthoptics case is not that orthoptists replace pediatric ophthalmologists. It is that the U.S. is trying to solve a subspecialty access problem with too little delegated binocular-vision, ocular-motility, and diagnostic capacity. The U.S. currently has only **17 AOC-accredited orthoptic training programs**, a tiny and poorly measured workforce, and even federal occupational data do not cleanly identify orthoptists because O*NET maps them to a much broader residual occupation. Yet the evidence that orthoptists can extend capacity is consistent: a U.S. practice-efficiency study found that adding a certified orthoptist increased revenue by **more than $70,000** over 6 months, and orthoptist-led models abroad have shown shorter visits, improved throughput, lower per-appointment cost, and lower waiting lists. citeturn33view0turn32search6turn35search3turn36search2turn36search20turn36search1

## Stat cards

| Value | Metric / what it measures | Scope & population | Period | Source | Confidence | One-line so what |
|---|---:|---|---|---|---|---|
| **1,056 pediatric ophthalmologists** | Pediatric ophthalmologists identified from AAO + AAPOS public directories | United States; public-directory-listed clinicians | March 2022 | Walsh et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2023 citeturn14search11turn15search1 | [Measured] | This is the most cited recent headcount, but it is a directory count, not a licensure registry. |
| **12.7 per 1 million people younger than 19 years** | Pediatric ophthalmologist density | United States; population younger than 19 years | March 2022 / 2020 Census denominator | Walsh et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2023 citeturn14search3turn24search4 | [Measured] | That is only about **1.27 per 100,000 children**, which is thin for a surgical subspecialty with major urban clustering. |
| **32.2 per 1 million people younger than 19 years** | Mean density in counties that actually had at least 1 pediatric ophthalmologist | U.S. counties with ≥1 pediatric ophthalmologist | March 2022 | Walsh et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2023 citeturn14search3turn14search10 | [Measured] | The problem is not just low national supply; it is highly uneven distribution. |
| **2,828 of 3,142 counties, or 90.0%** | Counties with zero pediatric ophthalmologists | United States counties | March 2022 | Walsh et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2023 citeturn14search11turn14search15 | [Measured] | Most U.S. counties are pediatric-eye-care deserts if the relevant specialist is a pediatric ophthalmologist. |
| **4 of 50 states, or 8.0%** | States with zero pediatric ophthalmologists | United States states | March 2022 | Walsh et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2023 citeturn14search11 | [Measured] | Entire states can lack even one listed pediatric ophthalmologist. |
| **1,060 pediatric ophthalmologists** | Pediatric ophthalmologists identified from public databases | United States; public-directory-listed clinicians | April 2023 | Siegler et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2024 citeturn18search4turn30search17 | [Measured] | The national headcount rose only trivially between the 2022 and 2023 directory-based studies. |
| **308 counties, or 9.7%** | Counties with at least 1 pediatric ophthalmologist | United States counties | April 2023 | Siegler et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2024 citeturn18search4turn23search2 | [Measured] | One year later, the county-level access picture remained essentially unchanged. |
| **2,834 counties, or 90.2%** | Counties with no pediatric ophthalmologist | United States counties | April 2023 | Siegler et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2024 citeturn23search2turn23search4 | [Measured] | The access desert barely moved from 2022 to 2023. |
| **2,731 of 2,834 counties, or 96.4%** | Counties without a pediatric ophthalmologist that also lacked a pediatric optometrist | United States counties | April 2023 | Siegler et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2024 citeturn23search2 | [Measured] | In most counties that lack pediatric ophthalmologists, there is no obvious substitute pediatric eye specialist either. |
| **1 in 7 American children** | Children living outside 60 minutes of pediatric ophthalmology care | United States children | Published 2025; care coverage based on contemporary geospatial analysis | Franco et al., *J AAPOS* 2025 citeturn21search2turn20search3 | [Measured] | The access problem is not just county presence or absence; many children live beyond a one-hour drive. |
| **~800 to 900 practicing pediatric ophthalmologists providing surgical care** | Narrower estimate of active pediatric ophthalmology surgical workforce | United States | Review published 2025 | Franco et al./review summary in *J AAPOS* context citeturn15search2 | [Estimate] | This lower figure conflicts with directory counts and likely reflects a narrower “actively practicing surgical” frame. |
| **29.8% average vacancy rate; 18.6 average vacant slots per year; range 14 to 23** | Unfilled pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus fellowship positions | U.S. PO&S fellowship match cycles | 2016–2024 | Adhan et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2025 citeturn11search1turn41search1 | [Measured] | The pipeline is not just weak; it is persistently underfilled by roughly one-third. |
| **72% to 47%** | Share of available PO&S fellowship positions filled by U.S. graduates | U.S. PO&S fellowships | 2016 vs 2024 | Adhan et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2025; follow-on summary 2025 citeturn11search4turn40search14 | [Measured] | Even when positions fill, the domestic replacement pipeline is thinning. |
| **217 applicants; 129 matched into PO&S; 29 matched into other ophthalmology fellowships; 59 did not match** | Applicant outcomes in SF Match analysis | Applicants to U.S. PO&S fellowships | 2021-22 to 2023-24 cycles | Khan et al., *J AAPOS* 2026 citeturn9search4 | [Measured] | The applicant pool is small enough that modest changes in interest can materially change future supply. |
| **Almost half go unfilled annually** | Qualitative summary of annual fellowship vacancy burden | U.S. pediatric ophthalmology fellowship programs | Study published 2025 | Kumar et al., *J AAPOS* 2025 citeturn9search10turn41search7 | [Estimate] | Independent literature is now describing this under-fill problem as routine, not exceptional. |
| **54% response rate** | Survey response rate for residency-program study on pediatric fellowship pursuit | U.S. ophthalmology residency programs | Study published 2025 | Kumar et al., *J AAPOS* 2025 citeturn9search10 | [Measured] | Workforce-attitude data are useful, but many recent studies still rely on partial survey response. |
| **243 respondents; 44.0% reported a 10%–25% surgical revenue decrease; 52.2% reported a 10%–25% overhead increase** | Economic stress survey results | U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists in convenience survey | Jan 2021 to Jul 2022 experience; paper published 2022 | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2022 citeturn28search3turn28search6 | [Estimate] | The specialty’s economic base is deteriorating in exactly the way that predicts recruitment problems. |
| **29.6%** | Respondents subsidizing income with pursuits outside pediatric ophthalmology | U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists in survey | 2022 survey | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2022 citeturn24search5 | [Estimate] | A meaningful share of specialists are already cross-subsidizing the subspecialty. |
| **11.1%** | Respondents who stopped operating due to reimbursement cuts | U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists in survey | 2022 survey | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2022 citeturn24search5 | [Estimate] | Reimbursement pressure is not abstract; it has operational consequences. |
| **30.8%** | Respondents limiting Medicaid or other publicly funded patients | U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists in survey | 2022 survey | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2022 citeturn24search5 | [Estimate] | This is one clear mechanism by which a Medicaid-heavy payer mix converts into longer waits and farther travel. |
| **6.5% retired in the past 3 years** | Self-reported retirement frequency | U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists in survey | 2022 survey | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2022 citeturn24search5 | [Estimate] | The retirement cliff is already visible, even before a perfect age-structured workforce model exists. |
| **37.8% would not recommend pediatric ophthalmology fellowship** | Specialty discouragement signal | U.S.-based pediatric ophthalmologists in survey | 2022 survey | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2022 citeturn24search5 | [Estimate] | That is a serious leading indicator of future recruitment weakness. |
| **57.1%** | Mean Medicaid share at academic eye centers/children’s hospitals | U.S. academic eye centers/children’s hospitals, 41 states | 2023 study | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2023 citeturn30search7 | [Measured] | High-volume tertiary centers are carrying a disproportionately public-payer-heavy case mix. |
| **3.9 months new; 3.4 months follow-up; 2.7 months surgery** | Mean wait times at academic eye centers/children’s hospitals | U.S. academic eye centers/children’s hospitals, 41 states | 2023 study | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2023 citeturn30search7 | [Measured] | Long waits are already normal in the parts of the system most likely to accept complex and Medicaid-insured children. |
| **4.4 vs 3.5 months** | New-patient wait time in high vs low Medicaid-insured states | U.S. academic eye centers/children’s hospitals | 2023 study | Lee et al., *J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus* 2023 citeturn30search7 | [Measured] | Medicaid exposure appears linked to longer waits, even if the study was not powered for every state-level difference. |
| **24 years median years in practice** | Workforce aging proxy for pediatric ophthalmologists | U.S. pediatric ophthalmologists in AAPOS-based database | 2022 analysis, published 2023 | Ali et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2023 citeturn27view0 | [Measured] | The current workforce is experienced, but that also means a substantial retirement wave is plausible. |
| **23 states at high risk** | States flagged “high risk” in the most aggressive retirement model | U.S. states | 2023 modeling study | Ali et al., *JAMA Ophthalmology* 2023 citeturn27view0 | [Modeled] | Under plausible assumptions, retirement alone could create multi-state underaccess. |
| **70% overall workforce adequacy by 2035; 77% metro vs 29% nonmetro** | Projected ophthalmology workforce adequacy | United States ophthalmology workforce, not pediatric only | 2020–2035 projection | Berkowitz et al., *Ophthalmology* 2024 citeturn24search8turn37search4 | [Modeled] | Even the broader ophthalmology workforce is projected to become inadequate, especially outside metro areas. |
| **17 accredited orthoptic fellowship programs** | Current U.S. orthoptic training-program count | United States; AOC-accredited programs | Current AOC website, accessed 2026 | American Orthoptic Council citeturn33view0turn33view1 | [Measured] | Orthoptics exists in the U.S., but its training base is tiny relative to national pediatric-eye-care need. |
| **24 months** | Standard orthoptic training length | United States; AOC-accredited orthoptic programs | Current AOC standard | American Orthoptic Council citeturn33view0turn31search4 | [Measured] | Orthoptists are not ad hoc technicians; they are formally trained allied professionals. |
| **16 established programs** | Earlier U.S. orthoptic training-program count | United States | 2023 article | *Ophthalmic Professional* 2023 citeturn32search22 | [Measured] | The program count itself is small and slightly moving, highlighting how narrow the pipeline is. |
| **“More jobs available than orthoptists graduating”** | Direction-of-travel statement on orthoptic labor market | United States | Program page current in web index | Ross Eye Institute orthoptic program citeturn34search2 | [Estimate] | Even training programs themselves describe demand outstripping new supply. |
| **41,300 employees** | O*NET “Orthoptists” employment figure | United States; actually broader residual occupation | 2024 | O*NET 29-1299.02 citeturn32search2turn32search6 | [Low-confidence] | This number is not a usable U.S. orthoptist headcount because it is drawn from “Healthcare Diagnosing or Treating Practitioners, All Other.” |
| **>$70,000 increase in practice revenue** | Financial impact of adding a second certified orthoptist | Single U.S. pediatric ophthalmology practice | 6-month study, published 2015 | Miller et al., *American Orthoptic Journal* / PubMed citeturn35search3 | [Measured] | Orthoptists are not just clinically useful; they can be economically accretive physician extenders. |
| **Mean time per appointment 45.11 vs 25.85 minutes** | Consultant-led vs orthoptist-led clinic appointment time | Pediatric NF1 screening clinic in Australia | Study published 2023 | Kaur et al. scholarly summary citeturn36search20turn36search8 | [Measured] | Orthoptist-led follow-up can materially increase throughput for selected care pathways. |
| **Lower mean cost per appointment** | Cost advantage of orthoptist-led NF1 screening | Pediatric NF1 ophthalmic screening in Australia | Study published 2023 | Kaur et al., *AJO* / PubMed citeturn36search2turn36search8 | [Measured] | This is direct evidence that shifting appropriate follow-up work can save money without removing specialist oversight. |
| **2,044 patients removed from a cataract pre-assessment waitlist** | Wait-list reduction from orthoptist-led clinics | NSW Health orthoptist-led clinic examples | Report published 2020 | NSW Health orthoptist workforce report citeturn36search1turn35search16 | [Measured] | Orthoptist-led service redesign has produced large, concrete throughput gains in public systems. |
| **Significant decrease in pediatric waiting-list numbers** | Pediatric triage gain from orthoptist-led clinics | Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network example | Report published 2020 | NSW Health orthoptist workforce report citeturn36search1turn35search16 | [Measured] | The pediatric use case already exists internationally: orthoptists can triage and absorb routine-but-specialized work. |
| **66.1% of orthoptic departments in hospitals with a stroke unit provided stroke vision services; only 27.6% were funded** | Scale and underfunding of orthoptic stroke services | UK and Ireland orthoptic departments | 2026 survey | Hepworth et al., *Eye* 2026 citeturn35search2 | [Measured] | When orthoptists are deployed, they fill genuine neuro-ophthalmic capacity gaps—but funding still lags the need. |
| **7 fellowship-trained pediatric ophthalmologists and 7 orthoptists; ~35,000 outpatient visits and 1,500 surgeries annually** | One U.S. high-capacity team model | Vanderbilt pediatric ophthalmology division | Job posting published 2026 | AUPO open position listing citeturn41search10 | [Estimate] | The few U.S. centers that scale pediatric ophthalmology often do it with substantial orthoptist staffing. |
| **40% of children and adolescents may report blurred vision, light sensitivity, or diplopia immediately after concussion** | Visual-symptom burden after concussion | Children and adolescents after concussion | AAO clinical statement current online | AAO clinical statement on concussion citeturn38search4 | [Estimate] | Neuro-visual demand is rising in a way that directly overlaps orthoptic and pediatric ophthalmology skill sets. |
| **>180,000 kids with CVI or likely CVI; <20% diagnosed** | Estimated U.S. CVI burden | United States children | Perkins/McKinsey estimate cited in 2025 review | Frontiers review; Perkins CVI estimates citeturn38search17turn38search21 | [Estimate] | Hidden neuro-visual morbidity likely enlarges the unmet pediatric-eye-care workload beyond what clinic rosters show. |
| **44.5 million Americans projected to be myopic by 2050** | Projected myopia burden | United States population | NEI projection cited by National Academies, 2024 | National Academies chapter citing NEI citeturn37search3turn37search7 | [Modeled] | Not all myopia belongs to pediatric ophthalmology, but the rising pediatric vision workload amplifies specialty bottlenecks. |
| **Supply down 12%; demand up 24%** | Ophthalmology workforce change | United States ophthalmology workforce | 2020–2035 | Berkowitz et al., *Ophthalmology* 2024 citeturn37search0turn37search4 | [Modeled] | The pediatric access crisis is occurring inside a broader ophthalmology supply squeeze. |

## Supply and pipeline

The U.S. pediatric ophthalmology workforce is strained in two different ways at once: the **current stock is too thin and too unevenly distributed**, and the **future inflow is weak**. The best recent directory-based counts identified **1,056 pediatric ophthalmologists in March 2022** and **1,060 in April 2023**, which is basically flat growth. A newer review then argued that the number of clinicians actually providing surgical pediatric ophthalmology care may be closer to **800 to 900**, which is a materially smaller workforce than the public-directory count suggests. That disagreement is not just academic. It means the U.S. lacks a clean, registry-grade denominator for one of the most access-sensitive pediatric subspecialties. citeturn14search11turn18search4turn15search2

The pipeline signal is worse than the stock signal. The recent trend paper covering **2016 to 2024 fellowship cycles** found an **average vacancy rate of 29.8%**, or **18.6 vacant PO&S fellowship slots per year**, with a range from **14 vacancies in 2019** to **23 in 2022**. The same study found that the proportion of available fellowship positions filled by **U.S. graduates** fell from **72% in 2016** to **47% in 2024**. The newer SF Match paper, which analyzed **217 applicants across the 2021-22 to 2023-24 cycles**, shows how small the applicant pool really is: **129 applicants matched into pediatric ophthalmology**, **29 matched another ophthalmology subspecialty**, and **59 did not match**. In a small pipeline, modest shifts in resident interest produce large downstream supply effects. citeturn11search1turn11search4turn9search4

Why are residents not choosing the field? The recent literature points to a coherent mechanism: pediatric ophthalmology is clinically demanding, often Medicaid-heavy, and economically weaker than competing ophthalmology subspecialties. A 2022 survey found that **44.0%** of respondents reported a **10% to 25% decrease in surgical revenue**, **52.2%** reported a **10% to 25% increase in overhead**, **29.6%** were subsidizing income outside pediatric ophthalmology, **11.1%** had stopped operating because of reimbursement cuts, and **37.8%** would not recommend the fellowship. A 2025 resident-exposure study explicitly described pediatric ophthalmology as a field where **almost half of fellowship slots go unfilled annually**. Older salary literature, summarized in later workforce reviews, also identified pediatric ophthalmology as the lowest-paid ophthalmology subspecialty on historical faculty and private-practice salary comparisons, which helps explain the long-running recruitment problem even if the exact dollar figures are older than ideal. citeturn28search3turn24search5turn9search10turn28search7turn24search17

The retirement side compounds the recruitment problem. In the JAMA Ophthalmology retirement-forecasting study, pediatric ophthalmologists had a **median 24 years in practice**, and under the study’s most aggressive retirement assumptions, **23 states** were flagged at risk of underaccess due to retirement-related losses. That model did **not** account for continued fellowship under-fill, so it is better read as a lower-bound warning than a worst-case scenario. Meanwhile, the survey evidence already captured **6.5% of respondents retiring in the prior three years**. Together, the field looks less like a stable equilibrium and more like a specialty whose visible shortages may worsen abruptly once retirements accelerate. citeturn27view0turn24search5

## Geographic access cliff

The U.S. access problem is not subtle. It is a cliff. In the 2022 national cross-sectional study, **90.0% of counties** had **zero** pediatric ophthalmologists, and one year later the 2023 practitioner-type study still found **90.2% of counties** without one. This is the core structural point: the typical American county has no local pediatric ophthalmologist at all. That means the working unit of access is not “Can I find one in my county?” but “How far must I travel into the nearest metro referral basin?” citeturn14search11turn23search2

The 2025 geospatial coverage study makes that more concrete: **about 1 in 7 American children live outside 60 minutes of pediatric ophthalmology care**. That statistic matters more than the county statistic, because counties vary greatly in size and population. A child can technically live in a county with a pediatric ophthalmologist and still face a burdensome trip, while a child in a neighboring county might be near an urban border and have easier access. So the strongest current statement is this: the national county map says the system is sparse, and the drive-time analysis says that sparsity converts into real travel burden for millions of children. citeturn21search2turn20search3

There is also a social-gradient component. Counties without pediatric ophthalmologists had lower household income and worse transportation and connectivity markers in both the 2022 and 2023 analyses, and the more recent practitioner-type study showed that **96.4%** of counties without a pediatric ophthalmologist also lacked a pediatric optometrist. In other words, many of the places with the greatest specialist scarcity also lack a nearby pediatric-eye-care fallback. This is why the access issue is better understood as a pediatric eye-care desert problem, not just a specialist preference problem. citeturn23search2turn23search11turn30search17

The wait-time data point in the same direction. The Medicaid-focused 2023 study found mean wait times of **3.9 months** for new patients and **2.7 months** for non-emergency surgery at academic eye centers and children’s hospitals, which are the same institutions that absorb many Medicaid-insured, complex, and travel-intensive referrals. States with higher Medicaid patient shares had longer waits for new visits. That is exactly what you would expect when a workforce is both thin and financially misaligned: care concentrates in tertiary centers, and then access degrades further at those centers because the payer mix is unfavorable and the total specialist supply is too small. citeturn30search7turn30search13

## Orthoptic leverage and what the US is giving up

The practical case for orthoptics is that pediatric ophthalmology has too much work that **requires high-level binocular-vision and ocular-motility expertise** but does **not always require physician time at every step**. Pediatric strabismus, amblyopia follow-up, sensorimotor examinations, surgical measurements, postoperative alignment checks, neuro-ophthalmic visual assessment, and selected screening pathways are all areas where orthoptists can function as genuine force multipliers when a system is built to use them. The U.S. evidence base is smaller than the UK or Australian one, but it still points the same way. In a U.S. practice-efficiency study, adding a second certified orthoptist increased practice revenue by **more than $70,000** over six months, despite the orthoptist’s higher salary relative to an ophthalmic assistant. The mechanism is straightforward: more specialized delegated work means better physician throughput and more appropriate use of surgeon time. citeturn35search3

Internationally, the evidence is stronger and more operational. In Australia, a cost analysis of an **orthoptist-led neurofibromatosis type 1 screening clinic** found lower mean cost per appointment than consultant-led care, and a scholarly summary reported **mean appointment times of 45.11 minutes in consultant-led clinics versus 25.85 minutes in orthoptist-led clinics**. NSW Health’s orthoptist workforce report documented orthoptist-led clinics that removed **2,044 patients** from a cataract pre-assessment waiting list and reported a significant reduction in pediatric waiting-list numbers through orthoptist-led triage. These are precisely the kinds of gains the U.S. system needs: lower-cost follow-up pathways, faster triage, and fewer consultant slots spent on standardized assessments that an orthoptist can perform with protocolized escalation. citeturn36search2turn36search20turn36search1turn35search16

The UK stroke and neuro-visual pathway literature shows the same logic in another domain. A 2026 *Eye* survey found stroke vision services operating in **66.1%** of orthoptic departments in hospitals with stroke units, but only **27.6%** were funded. NICE evidence reviews explicitly state that access to orthoptists on stroke units has been proposed to improve detection of post-stroke visual problems and accelerate access to management. That is exactly orthoptic leverage: scarce medical specialists are preserved for the highest-complexity decisions, while orthoptists systematically pick up diagnosis, screening, follow-up, triage, and monitoring work that otherwise becomes either specialist backlog or missed care. citeturn35search2turn35search6

The U.S. is also giving up data visibility by not institutionalizing orthoptics more fully. The AOC currently lists **17 accredited orthoptic training programs**, and training is a formal **24-month** program. But there is no robust national registry-quality workforce denominator analogous to what some other systems maintain, and the federal occupation code that nominally covers orthoptists pulls from the residual category **“Healthcare Diagnosing or Treating Practitioners, All Other,”** producing an implausible employment figure of **41,300** that is not usable as a real orthoptist count. That means the U.S. not only under-deploys orthoptists; it also under-measures them. In workforce analysis, invisibility is not neutral. It usually signals that a profession is not fully built into reimbursement, regulation, or planning. citeturn33view0turn32search6turn32search2

The final loop is demand. Pediatric ophthalmology is hit by rising neuro-visual and childhood-eye-health workload from several directions at once. Broader ophthalmology is projected to see a **12% supply decline** and **24% demand increase** from 2020 to 2035, leaving projected workforce adequacy at **70% overall**, **77% in metro areas**, and only **29% in nonmetro areas**. On top of that, pediatric and neuro-visual demand is being pushed by concussion-related visual symptoms, hidden CVI burden, and continuing pediatric screening needs. If the U.S. continues addressing that demand with a thin pediatric ophthalmologist workforce and a marginal orthoptist workforce, it is implicitly choosing slower triage, longer waits, more tertiary-center congestion, and more geographic inequity than systems that deploy orthoptists as a normal part of pediatric and neuro-ophthalmic service design. citeturn37search0turn37search4turn38search4turn38search17turn38search21

## Data gaps

The evidence is strong enough to show a real workforce and access problem, but there are still important questions the current literature cannot answer well.

- **Exact active U.S. pediatric ophthalmologist count.** Recent sources disagree between a directory-based count of about **1,056 to 1,060** and a narrower estimate of **800 to 900** actively providing surgical pediatric ophthalmology care. The difference is probably definitional, but the field lacks a definitive active-practice registry. citeturn14search11turn18search4turn15search2
- **Exact latest-cycle fellowship vacancies for 2024.** Recent literature clearly reports the 2016–2024 average vacancy burden and the declining U.S.-graduate share, but the accessible abstracts and snippets do not expose the exact 2024 vacancy count itself. citeturn11search1turn11search4
- **Direct child-level rural versus urban drive-time distribution.** The best recent paper gives the strong headline that **1 in 7** children live beyond 60 minutes from care, but accessible public summaries do not provide a full rural/urban percentile breakdown. citeturn21search2
- **National U.S. orthoptist headcount, age structure, and annual graduates.** AOC clearly reports **17 accredited programs**, but there is no authoritative national database showing how many orthoptists are actively practicing, their age distribution, annual graduate output, retirement flow, or geographic distribution. The main federal occupation data are too aggregated to solve this. citeturn33view0turn32search2turn32search6
- **Net replacement rate for pediatric ophthalmology and orthoptics.** There are enough fragments to say the pipeline is fragile and retirement risk is real, but not enough clean longitudinal data to calculate a highly defensible national net replacement rate for either profession without stronger assumptions than the evidence supports. citeturn27view0turn11search1turn24search5
- **Comparative U.S. outcome effects of orthoptic deployment.** The evidence that orthoptists improve efficiency is real, especially internationally, but the U.S. still lacks a large contemporary study linking orthoptist staffing density to national differences in wait times, surgery access, amblyopia completion, or postoperative follow-up outcomes. citeturn35search3turn36search2turn36search1